Positives & Negatives : Chelsea 3 – 3 Manchester United

First and foremost, any team leading 3-Nil, after 55 minutes, at home, should bag all the three points. The very fact that Chelsea failed to do so, puts them in the category of the losers this week. Manchester United were brave and hungrier than Chelsea and at later stages looked like the side which deserved to win. It is a case of two points dropped for both the teams as those two points could have kept the competition away from Chelsea and would have helped Manchester United to pile up the pressure over Manchester City.

Moving on…

3 Positives For Manchester United

1.) Javier Hernandez again proved his worth in his substitute appearance. He is a better player, as compared to Danny Welbeck, to play alongside Wayne Rooney. Welbeck for all his running and harrying capabilities does not have the movement to create space or ghost inside the penalty box. Chicharito does. But, Sir Alex knows better, and if it ain’t broke why fix it.

2.) Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes, with a combined age of 75 years, proved to be the difference makers in the end. Giggs provided a peach of a cross for Hernandez to score and was involved in almost every forward move that United made in the second half comeback. Paul Scholes, bossed the midfield after his introduction and put up a delightful array of long passes that included everything from over the top through balls, cross field passes and simple clearances. As long as United are able to reap the benefits from these two legends, they should do so.

3.) Wayne Rooney’s passion to play for United seemed to come back in this match. He was visibly upset when United did not get the penalty appeal, and seemed the most pumped up player when United started sensing a comeback. He is an altogether different player when he is at the right place mentally, and going by Sunday’s performance, he seems to have put behind his issues with Sir Alex (at least for now) and concentrate on the bigger challenge.

3 Negatives For Chelsea

1.) AVB’s poor decision making when it comes to substitutions, continues. An absolutely baffling decision to replace Daniel Sturridge with Oriol Romeu. Agreed that the substitution in itself was correct, as Romeu helped stem some of the attacks from Manchester United. But the choice of player for substitution was wrong. If there was any player who deserved to leave the field at that point of time, it had to be Florent Malouda. The Frenchman was absolutely anonymous and ineffective in the second half, and should have been the person to make way.

2.) Gary Cahill’s stuttering start to his Chelsea career. Throughout the match Cahill, looked threatened by the power and pace of Welbeck and was lucky not to get sent off within the first 15 minutes. There is a theory that says he will improve if he is put alongside John Terry instead of the eccentric David Luiz, as Terry is a more vocal defender and organises the defence better, but shouldn’t Cahill be better.

3.) Fernando Torres has had enough chances now and is still not gaining confidence, even after the pressure on him has relieved a little, following Drogba’s departure to the African Cup Of Nations. His ability to play on the shoulder of the last defender is lost. His shot taking ability is lost. His decision making ability inside the box is lost. If at all anything has improved, it is his overall work rate and assists. But he was brought in to score goals, and he is not doing it at the moment. Quite frankly, if he hasn’t been able to do it so far, it would be foolish to pin your hopes on him for the rest of the season.

Advertisements